Cloud Adoption.
A migrated, optimized cloud estate with documented landing zones, governance and FinOps practices — TCO measured, reported and managed.
Common failure patterns
These are the patterns Aurora’s engagement model is designed to prevent.
Lift-and-shift without landing zone.
Accounts multiply ungoverned. Security posture fragments across teams.
FinOps deferred until post-migration.
Cloud bill grows 3x before anyone establishes a measurement baseline.
Security configured per-account.
No organization-wide policy. Compliance audit reveals gaps months later.
Aurora’s operating approach
Our cloud architects own the target-state architecture, the landing zone design and the FinOps practice. Our migration engineers run the workload moves. Our security engineers configure the posture framework. Partner extensions: hyperscaler-certified delivery teams for surge capacity on large migration waves, FinOps and security posture tooling where the engagement requires licensed platforms.
Operational outcome
A migrated, optimized cloud estate with documented landing zones, governance and FinOps practices — TCO measured, reported and managed. Migration is the start of the engagement, not the end.
Service shape
Engagement tiers
Partner extensions
SCALER
OPS
Typical engagement lifecycle
Cloud Adoption Framework workshop. Target state and guardrails defined.
Landing zone build — network, identity, secrets, observability.
Workload migration in waves under documented runbooks.
FinOps and security embed for post-migration optimization.
Operational deliverables
A documented landing zone you could brief a new engineer on in an hour.
TCO measured against pre-migration baseline, reported monthly.
Security posture defensible to an external audit, not just to internal review.